<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anti-Democratic Caucus</title>
	<link>http://www.2concon.org/the-anti-democratic-caucus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ron dorman</title>
		<link>http://www.2concon.org/the-anti-democratic-caucus/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>ron dorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.2concon.org/the-anti-democratic-caucus/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Let's face it--electing a President is anti-democratic from beginning to end.  The caucus  favors the activist, the super delegate favors the privileged, and the winner-take-all primary ignores a substantial portion of the electorate.

Finally, we don't elect a President----we elect electors.  And, we choose electors with the discredited winner-take-all system.  In some cases involving more than two candidates, Congress gets to choose our President.

When will we have had enough of this pseudo democracy and make some meaningful reforms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it&#8211;electing a President is anti-democratic from beginning to end.  The caucus  favors the activist, the super delegate favors the privileged, and the winner-take-all primary ignores a substantial portion of the electorate.</p>
<p>Finally, we don&#8217;t elect a President&#8212;-we elect electors.  And, we choose electors with the discredited winner-take-all system.  In some cases involving more than two candidates, Congress gets to choose our President.</p>
<p>When will we have had enough of this pseudo democracy and make some meaningful reforms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

